期刊目次

加入编委

期刊订阅

添加您的邮件地址以接收即将发行期刊数据:

Open Access Article

Law and Social Justice. 2025; 2: (1) ; 27-35 ; DOI: 10.12208/j.lsj.20250005.

A review of the theory and practice of the application of the principle of fairness in the civil code
民法典中公平原则适用的理论与实践综述

作者: 唐勇 *

湖北大学 湖北武汉

*通讯作者: 唐勇,单位:湖北大学 湖北武汉;

发布时间: 2025-12-25 总浏览量: 48

摘要

《中华人民共和国民法典》将公平原则确立为基本原则之一,在私法体系中发挥着重要的价值引领与规范补充功能。随着民法典的实施,公平原则在司法实践中的适用频率显著提升,并逐渐由传统的补充性规范向具有实质裁判功能的原则转变。然而,在具体适用过程中,公平原则仍面临适用边界模糊、裁量标准不统一,以及与诚实信用原则、公序良俗原则交叉重叠等问题,进而引发“泛化适用”与裁判不确定性的现实困境。本文在系统梳理公平原则规范基础的前提下,综合运用规范分析、案例分析与比较研究方法,对民法典实施以来公平原则的理论发展与司法适用状况进行综述性研究。研究发现,公平原则在合同、侵权及家事等领域均呈现出扩张适用趋势,其核心功能主要体现在利益衡量与风险再分配,但同时也存在过度依赖法官自由裁量、类型化不足等问题。基于上述分析,本文认为,应通过明确公平原则的适用条件、强化类型化规则建构以及完善司法解释,对其适用进行适度限缩与规范化,从而在实现个案正义的同时维护法律适用的确定性。本文的研究有助于深化对民法典基本原则运行机制的理解,并为公平原则的合理适用提供理论支持与制度参考。

关键词: 民法典;公平原则;司法适用;利益衡量;自由裁量;类型化规则

Abstract

The Civil Code of the People ' s Republic of China establishes the principle of fairness as a fundamental principle, playing a vital role in guiding values and supplementing legal norms within the private law system. With its implementation, the application of the principle of fairness in judicial practice has significantly increased, gradually evolving from a supplementary norm into a substantive basis for adjudication. However, in practice, problems such as ambiguous boundaries, inconsistent standards of judicial discretion, and overlaps with the principles of good faith and public order and good morals have led to concerns over excessive application and legal uncertainty. Based on a systematic review of its normative foundation, this paper employs doctrinal analysis, case study, and comparative research to examine the development and application of the principle of fairness under the Civil Code. The findings indicate that the principle shows an expanding trend across contract, tort, and family law, mainly functioning in interest balancing and risk redistribution, while also revealing issues such as over-reliance on judicial discretion and insufficient typification. Accordingly, this paper argues that the application of the principle of fairness should be appropriately restricted and standardized by clarifying its conditions, strengthening typified rules, and improving judicial interpretations, so as to balance substantive justice and legal certainty. This study provides theoretical support and practical guidance for the proper application of the principle of fairness.

Key words: Civil code; Principle of fairness; Judicial application; Interest balancing; Judicial discretion; Typification rules

参考文献 References

[1] 陶韵伊.《民法典》533条中再交涉性质之界定[C]//中国智慧工程研究会.2025企业发展与社会治理创新经验交流会论文集.中国人民公安大学;,2025:14-18. 

[2] 古筝. 《民法典》视角下同居关系财产分割的法律适用与裁判规则——以司法解释为补充的路径探索[J].法制博览,2025,(35):88-90.

[3] 王秀明. 《民法典》实施背景下推动营商环境保障体系完善的策略[J].法制博览,2025,(25):67-69.

[4] Shu W . An In-Depth Analysis of the Principle of Non-Refoulement and the Syrian Refugee Problem[J]. International Education and Social Science Exploration, 2025,1(8):

[5] Kock D C ,Verhaeghe F ,Linthout L , et al. Ethics in Qualitative Migration and Refugee Studies in Europe: From “Doing no Harm” to Reciprocity and Equity[J]. International Journal of Qualitative Methods,2025,24.

[6] 王小菊.民法典担保制度新规下开发商阶段性保证责任的免除认定[D].贵州师范大学,2025. 

[7] 李芸萱.《民法典》视域下劳动关系中竞业限制协议司法适用研究[D].上海师范大学,2025. 

[8] 潘米. 《民法典》背景下商法交易安全基本原则的解构与重塑[J].贵州社会科学,2025,(02):162-168.

[9] 申惠文,张晓蕾. 《民法典》公平原则司法适用研究——基于241份裁判文书的考察[J].南阳理工学院学报,2025, 17(01):14-21.

[10] 黄泷一. 《民法典》第322条(添附)评注[J].法学家,2024, (05):171-189+196.

[11] 朱祥贵,朱娇,杜国荣,等. 民法典时代混合共同担保内部追偿权研究[J].三峡大学学报(人文社会科学版),2024, 46(05):78-85.

[12] 冉博.民法典时代的形成之诉研究[D].东南大学,2024. 

[13] 何定洁,陈娟. 公平责任一般条款限定适用论——以《民法典》第1186条为分析对象[J].四川大学法律评论,2024, 21(01):309-322.

[14] 李雯倬.《民法典》视阈下我国公序良俗原则的司法适用研究[D].海南大学,2024. 

[15] 朱梦瑜.《民法典》公平分担损失规则的司法适用研究[D].广东外语外贸大学,2024. 

[16] 王得志.《民法典》自甘风险规则的法律适用研究[D].西北民族大学,2024. 

[17] Changming D ,Xiangjie G ,Yanchun L . Decomposition of volatile organic compounds using corona discharge plasma technology.[J].Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995),2019,69(8):879-899.

[18] Bruno C . The State of the Art of Hybrid RANS/LES Modeling for the Simulation of Turbulent Flows.[J].Flow, turbulence and combustion,2017,99(2):279-327.

[19] Dru B .Global Health Disputes and Disparities:A Critical Appraisal of International Law and Population Health[M].Taylor and Francis:2012-12-07.

[20] 申惠文,张晓蕾.《民法典》公平原则司法适用研究 ——基于241份裁判文书的考察[J]. 南阳理工学院学报. 2025,(1):14-21.

[21] 孟勤国,严冬.《民法典》视域下合伙合同解除规则的建构[J]. 烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版).2025,38(1):33-44.

[22] 端木玉芳,郭莹.法治化营商环境建设背景下的《民法典》价值功能梳理与规则评价[J]. 法制博览.2025,(9):46-48.

[23] 孟春阳,张超琴.民法典中绿色原则适用纾解[J]. 合作经济与科技.2025,(1):190-192.

[24] 莫静文,姚蔚华.基于《民法典》的家庭财产制度探讨[J]. 楚天法治.2025,(6):123-126.

[25] 杨艳梅.《民法典》中诚实信用原则的适用边界探究[J]. 法制博览.2025,(22):82-84.

引用本文

唐勇, 民法典中公平原则适用的理论与实践综述[J]. 法学与社会正义, 2025; 2: (1) : 27-35.